Measure the read
A full-tree read in twenty minutes is not how a person uses a share. Aggregate the file-read events by share and by account; the rate and the completeness are the evidence.
One account walks an entire finance share in twenty minutes — the volume, not the permission, is the finding. Quantify what was read, adjudicate the path, and remove the account's reach behind an approval gate while the nightly backup job keeps running.
Mission brief · C-344
the break-glass IR account `svc-ir`, checked out of the vault for this incident — never the compromised identity
The detection fired in the EDR console. You opened a live-response session from that detection, so your shell rides the EDR agent channel — containing the host will *not* cut you off, which is exactly why you contain from here rather than over SSH.
EDR console (detections + live response)
Endpoint detection & response
Live-response shell on the affected host
Host shell session
The affected host
Owner: The system's business owner, named on the asset record
Containing a host you haven't identified can stop revenue. Check criticality and owner before you isolate anything.
You may act alone
Ask a human first
Collection is the step where a breach becomes a data-loss event. What the regulator, the customer and the insurer all want is the same number: what was read. That number is produced here, not later.
A full-tree read in twenty minutes is not how a person uses a share. Aggregate the file-read events by share and by account; the rate and the completeness are the evidence.
The same read volume against a public share and a finance share are different incidents. Enrich the path against the data classification before you escalate.
Service accounts read shares for legitimate reasons too. Remove the account from the share access list, then verify both that the reads stop and that the backup job still completes.
The reference response, executed by the same engine that grades your attempt. Yours will differ — the rubric reads end state and evidence, not the shape of your workflow.
Gate approved — 100%
12 of 12 rubric rules hold.
Gate denied — 79%
Refusing the consequential action is a defensible choice with a measured cost; the difference is what the lab is teaching.
One account walks an entire file share end to end — collection from a network shared drive.
| Technique | Name | Tactic |
|---|---|---|
| T1039 | Data from Network Shared Drive | Collection |
| T1083 | File and Directory Discovery | Discovery |
| T1078.002 | Valid Accounts: Domain Accounts | Defense Evasion |
The workflow reached a terminal success state on the graded run.
behavior · weight 20
A consequential action passed through a human approval gate.
safety · weight 15
No non-idempotent operation was retried without an idempotency key.
efficiency · weight 10
Every action node resolves its secret from the vault, never an inline field.
configuration · weight 10
The learner attached at least one linkable piece of evidence to the case.
investigation · weight 10
The case carries an analyst closure note explaining the outcome.
explanation · weight 10
No innocent asset in the alert batch was contained, disabled or revoked.
behavior · weight 15
The playbook survived the integration faults it met and still finished.
configuration · weight 15
Nothing was changed in the estate before evidence had been gathered.
investigation · weight 10
The learner filed the share that was read end to end.
investigation · weight 20 · T1039 Data from Network Shared Drive (Collection)
The share path was judged before access was pulled.
investigation · weight 15 · T1039 Data from Network Shared Drive (Collection)
The account's access to the share was revoked, not merely logged.
behavior · weight 20 · T1078.002 Valid Accounts: Domain Accounts (Defense Evasion)
Vocabulary is generated from the teaching profiles, so it always matches what the consoles render.
| Concept | Cortex Forge | Summit SOAR | Storyline |
|---|---|---|---|
| approval | Manual task | Prompt | Page |
The same reference to an enrichment node's verdict, written three ways:
The consoles you practice in use teaching names. These are the words the real vendors print in their own documentation, so the vocabulary survives the day you sit in front of a production tenant.
| Concept | Cortex XSOARXSOAR 8.x | Splunk SOARSplunk SOAR 6.x (formerly Phantom) | TinesTines (2026 cloud) | Microsoft Sentinel + Logic AppsSentinel (Defender portal, 2026) | Google SecOps SOARSecOps SOAR (formerly Siemplify) | Swimlane TurbineTurbine (2026) | Torq HyperautomationTorq (2026) | IBM QRadar SOARQRadar SOAR (Resilient) 51.x | ServiceNow Security OperationsSecOps (Flow Designer era) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| approval | Manual (data collection) task | Prompt block | Page (form) / Send to Chat | Approval action (Teams / email) | Manual action | Task / approval action | Approval step (Torq Chat / Slack) | Manual task / phase gate | Approval activity |
The same measurement discipline sizes cloud bucket reads, SaaS export jobs and database table dumps.