Cybrary ForgeCYBRARY / FORGE
AI security track
Unit 3 — Adversarial ML and red-team operations
pass at 75%

Unit 3 assessment — Adversarial ML and red-team operations

Attacks on the model itself — extraction, membership inference, evasion — and how a campaign is run and reported against an AI system without turning it into anecdotes.

6 questions drawn from a bank of 9, in their own order with the options moved. Take it again and you sit a different paper.

0 of 6 answered

  1. 1. Which single control best supports an AI security program across all these attacks?

    Tests: Detection coverage for ML attacks

  2. 2. What makes an AI red-team result reproducible?

    Tests: Reproducibility in AI testing

  3. 3. Where does poisoning sit relative to the others?

    Tests: Poisoning versus runtime attacks

  4. 4. Membership inference asks which question?

    Tests: Membership inference

  5. 5. An evasion attack changes a few pixels and flips the classification. What does that show about the decision boundary?

    Tests: Evasion and decision boundaries

  6. 6. A red-team campaign report says 'the model can be jailbroken'. Why is that finding weak?

    Tests: Reporting AI red-team findings

Answer all 6 questions to submit.